Monday, May 26, 2025

University performance - Excel Tool

 Absolutely! Here’s a step-by-step guide to create an Excel data entry form with dependent dropdowns for stakeholder feedback — all on a single sheet.


Step 1: Prepare Your Data Lists

  1. Open a new Excel workbook.

  2. Create a new sheet called Lists (you can hide it later).

  3. In Lists, enter the Affiliations vertically starting from cell A2, e.g.:

A
Affiliation (header)
Students
Staff
Industry
Society
  1. Next to it, create columns for each affiliation with their respective Parameters, starting from row 2. For example:

A B C D E
Affiliation Students Staff Industry Society
Quality of Teaching Work Environment Graduate Employability Social Responsibility
Curriculum Relevance Workload & Job Satisfaction Curriculum Relevance Inclusivity
... ... ... ... ...

(Add all parameters under each affiliation column)


Step 2: Define Named Ranges

  1. Select the list of Affiliations (e.g., Lists!$A$2:$A$5), then go to Formulas > Define Name, name it Affiliations.

  2. Similarly, for each affiliation’s parameter list (e.g., Lists!$B$2:$B$11 for Students), create named ranges exactly matching the affiliation name (e.g., Students, Staff, Industry, Society).


Step 3: Setup the Data Entry Sheet

  1. Go back to your main worksheet, e.g., name it Feedback Form.

  2. In row 1, create headers:

A B C D E F
Respondent Name Affiliation Date Parameter Rating Comments/Suggestions
  1. Format the headers as bold and widen columns for clarity.


Step 4: Add Data Validation for Affiliation

  1. Select the cells in the Affiliation column where users will input data (e.g., B2:B100).

  2. Go to Data > Data Validation.

  3. Under Allow, select List.

  4. In Source, enter: =Affiliations

  5. Click OK.


Step 5: Add Dependent Dropdown for Parameters

  1. Select the cells under Parameter column where users will input data (e.g., D2:D100).

  2. Go to Data > Data Validation.

  3. Under Allow, select List.

  4. In Source, enter the formula: =INDIRECT(B2)

    • This formula makes the Parameter list depend on the value selected in Affiliation column in the same row.

  5. Click OK.

Note: For this to work properly, the affiliation names must exactly match the named ranges created in Step 2.


Step 6: Add Data Validation for Rating

  1. Select the Rating column cells (e.g., E2:E100).

  2. Go to Data > Data Validation.

  3. Under Allow, select List.

  4. Enter the source as: 1,2,3,4,5

  5. Click OK.


Step 7: Add Date Picker (Optional)

  • Excel doesn’t have a native date picker in all versions, but you can format the Date column (C2:C100) as Date:

    • Select the cells.

    • Right-click > Format Cells > Date > Choose desired format.


Step 8: Final Touches

  • Freeze the header row (View > Freeze Panes > Freeze Top Row).

  • Optionally, hide the Lists sheet to prevent accidental edits.

  • Add instructions at the top or a separate sheet for users.

  • Protect the sheet to prevent editing headers or lists if desired.


If you want, I can also provide you with sample formulas or a downloadable step-by-step checklist.

Would you like me to prepare any additional tips or example screenshots?

University Performance - Society’s perspective

 Evaluating a university from the society’s perspective involves assessing how the institution contributes to the public good, social development, ethical standards, and community engagement. Unlike stakeholders like students or industry who have direct interactions, society evaluates the broader impact of the university on equity, inclusion, innovation, values, and community welfare.


🏛️ Society-Centric Evaluation of a University

Key Parameters and Indicators

Parameter Indicators
1. Social Responsibility & Outreach - Community service programs (NSS, NCC, Unnat Bharat Abhiyan)- Rural development initiatives- Participation in local governance or disaster relief
2. Inclusivity & Accessibility - Access for marginalized groups (SC/ST/OBC, rural students)- Gender balance in admissions and staffing- Facilities for differently-abled individuals
3. Environmental Sustainability - Green campus initiatives- Energy/water conservation measures- Waste management, tree plantation drives
4. Ethics, Values & Citizenship - Courses or activities promoting ethics and civic responsibility- Observance of Constitution Day, Human Rights Day- Anti-ragging, anti-discrimination practices
5. Cultural Preservation & Promotion - Promotion of local language, arts, heritage- Folk events, traditional art competitions- Documentation and research on regional knowledge
6. Public Health & Education Contribution - Health camps, awareness campaigns (HIV, COVID, menstrual health)- Literacy drives, digital literacy for rural population
7. Research with Societal Impact - Applied research solving local/regional problems- Public policy input, open access publishing- Extension services in agriculture, environment, public health
8. Lifelong Learning Opportunities - Community classes, certificate programs for citizens- Access to MOOCs, webinars, continuing education
9. Transparency & Accountability - Public disclosure of annual reports- Compliance with UGC/NAAC/NBA/RTI guidelines- Ethical grievance redressal mechanisms
10. Reputation & Public Perception - Media coverage, social media engagement- Word-of-mouth among local population- Role in regional development and pride

📊 Sample Rating Scale (1 to 5 Likert Scale)

Parameter Sample Rating
Social Responsibility 4.5
Inclusivity & Accessibility 4.0
Environmental Sustainability 3.8
Cultural and Ethical Engagement 4.2
Overall Societal Impact 4.1

🧠 Methods to Collect Society Feedback

  1. Community Surveys

    • Gather feedback from local residents, civil society members, and NGOs

  2. Public Forums and Town Hall Meetings

    • Conduct open discussions with citizens on university outreach efforts

  3. Media and Public Sentiment Analysis

    • Monitor coverage, social media sentiment, public complaints

  4. Feedback from NGOs / Local Bodies

    • Capture third-party opinions on university involvement and reliability


🎯 Characteristics of a Society-Centric University

  • Rooted in local relevance but with a global outlook

  • Acts as a change agent in its surrounding community

  • Transparent, accountable, and committed to inclusivity

  • Bridges knowledge with action for public good

  • Encourages citizen science, outreach, and community involvement


Would you like a societal impact assessment tool, a community survey form, or a dashboard template to visualize the university’s social contributions?

Let me know how you’d like to apply this framework.

University Performance - Industry's Perspective

 Judging a university from the industry's perspective involves evaluating how well the institution prepares graduates to meet current and future workforce demands, and how actively it engages in collaboration, innovation, and knowledge transfer.

Here is a comprehensive framework of the parameters and indicators used by industry to assess a university:


🏭 Industry-Centric Evaluation of a University

Key Parameters and Indicators

Parameter Indicators
1. Graduate Employability - Job-readiness of graduates- Soft skills, technical skills, adaptability- Internships or industrial training experience
2. Curriculum Relevance - Industry-aligned courses, certifications- Up-to-date syllabus with inputs from industry experts- Emerging tech inclusion (AI, IoT, sustainability, etc.)
3. Industry Collaboration - Industry-institute MoUs- Joint seminars, workshops, guest lectures- Industrial visits and immersion programs
4. Internships & Placements - Quantity and quality of internship programs- Support during onboarding- University-industry interface for placements
5. Faculty-Industry Engagement - Faculty exchange, internships in industry- Participation in industry research or consultancy- Faculty training in new technologies
6. Innovation & Research Ecosystem - Joint research, funded projects- IP generation, patents- Incubation support and startup collaborations
7. Responsiveness & Flexibility - Willingness to adapt curriculum on industry feedback- Speed of collaboration (approvals, action plans)- Outcome focus in MoUs
8. Entrepreneurship Support - Incubators, accelerators, startup cells- Availability of seed funding or mentoring- Hackathons, startup challenges with industry involvement
9. Alumni in Industry - Alumni holding key industry roles- Industry perception of graduates- Alumni-institution engagement in placements or advisory roles
10. Knowledge Transfer & Consultancy - Consultancy services to industry- Labs and centers of excellence accessible to industry- Tech transfer readiness

📊 Sample Rating Scale (1 to 5)

Parameter Sample Score
Graduate Employability 4.2
Curriculum Alignment 4.0
Internship Collaboration 3.8
Research & Innovation Engagement 3.6
Responsiveness & Professionalism 4.1
Overall Industry Satisfaction 4.0

🧠 Data Collection Methods from Industry

  1. Employer Surveys / Recruiter Feedback Forms

    • Gather feedback post-placement or internship

    • Use Likert scales and open-ended questions

  2. Advisory Board Inputs

    • Seek insights from industry advisory board members

  3. Alumni Feedback in Industry

    • Ask alumni now in leadership roles for insight on training gaps

  4. Consultancy Project Reviews

    • Industry feedback on outcomes and delivery quality

  5. Participation in Curriculum Design

    • Minutes and feedback from BoS, Academic Council, or IQAC where industry is involved


🎯 Characteristics of a University Valued by Industry

  • Proactive engagement in talent and tech development

  • Outcome-focused training aligned with real-world needs

  • Agile and responsive to feedback and collaboration

  • Facilitator of innovation through research and entrepreneurship

  • Nurtures a strong alumni network that strengthens industry ties


Would you like me to:

  • Create a Google Form or Excel-based Industry Feedback Tool?

  • Draft a sample MoU structure between university and industry?

  • Build a dashboard template to track industry satisfaction KPIs?

Let me know your needs!

University Performance - Staff's Perspective

 Judging a university from the staff’s point of view—especially teaching and non-teaching personnel—requires assessing how well the institution supports their professional development, working environment, recognition, and participation in governance.

Below is a comprehensive framework outlining the key parameters and indicators to evaluate a university from the staff perspective:


🧑‍🏫 Staff-Centric Evaluation of a University

Key Parameters and Indicators

Parameter Indicators
1. Work Environment & Culture - Respectful and inclusive work culture- Collegiality and team spirit- Fair HR practices
2. Workload & Job Satisfaction - Balanced teaching, research, and admin responsibilities- Realistic timelines and expectations
3. Opportunities for Growth - Availability of Faculty Development Programs (FDPs)- Support for higher studies or research- Sabbaticals and study leave policies
4. Recognition & Rewards - Timely promotions- Performance-based incentives- Awards for excellence in teaching/research/service
5. Participation in Governance - Inclusion in Academic Council, IQAC, BOS, etc.- Transparency in decision-making- Ability to contribute ideas or feedback
6. Infrastructure & Resources - Access to computers, labs, smart classrooms- Research labs, journal subscriptions, funding- Adequate office space, internet
7. Administrative Support - Efficiency of supporting departments- Responsiveness to needs (maintenance, HR, IT)- Clear administrative processes
8. Communication & Transparency - Regular faculty meetings and circulars- Access to policy documents- Open-door policies of leadership
9. Work-Life Balance - Reasonable working hours and leave policies- Child care, transport, canteen facilities
10. Staff Welfare & Safety - Medical care and insurance- Safety at workplace- Mental health and counseling support
11. Involvement in Innovation - Encouragement to participate in research, patents, startups- Institutional support for consultancy & projects

📊 Sample Rating Scale for Staff Feedback (1 to 5 Likert Scale)

Parameter Rating (Example)
Work Culture 4.2
Professional Development 3.8
Administrative Support 4.0
Recognition & Promotion 3.6
Communication & Transparency 4.1
Overall Staff Satisfaction 4.0

🧠 Data Collection Methods

  1. Anonymous Staff Surveys
    → Rating-scale questions + open-ended suggestions

  2. Periodic One-on-One Feedback
    → Especially helpful during performance appraisals

  3. Exit Interviews
    → Learn why staff leave, and how to improve retention

  4. Staff Meetings & Suggestion Systems
    → Empower participation and transparency


🎯 Characteristics of a Staff-Centric University

  • Encourages faculty autonomy and innovation

  • Offers fair opportunities for growth and promotion

  • Ensures workplace dignity and safety

  • Builds a supportive ecosystem for teaching and research

  • Practices shared governance and active listening


Would you like to generate a Google Form template for staff feedback or an Excel dashboard to monitor satisfaction trends semester-wise?

University Performance - Student's Perspective

 Judging a university from the student’s point of view involves assessing how well the institution meets their academic, career, and personal development needs. The evaluation should be student-centered, focusing on parameters that impact their learning, experience, and success.


🎓 Student-Centric Evaluation of a University

Key Parameters and Indicators

Parameter Indicators
1. Academic Quality - Faculty expertise and engagement- Innovative pedagogy (e.g., active learning, flipped classrooms)- Curriculum relevance and flexibility
2. Curriculum Relevance - Alignment with industry trends- Inclusion of emerging technologies/skills- Choice-based credit system (CBCS)
3. Assessment & Feedback - Fair and timely evaluations- Continuous internal assessment (CIA)- Constructive feedback from faculty
4. Learning Resources - Availability of updated textbooks, journals, and e-resources- Access to modern labs and ICT tools- Wi-Fi and digital infrastructure
5. Faculty Interaction & Support - Approachability and mentoring by faculty- Office hours or student support mechanisms
6. Career Support - Placement preparation & soft skills training- Internship opportunities- Career counseling and job fairs
7. Infrastructure & Facilities - Classrooms, hostels, sports, health centers- Accessibility and cleanliness- Facilities for differently-abled students
8. Student Voice & e-Governance - Feedback mechanisms on courses and teaching- Representation in committees (e.g., IQAC, Student Council)
9. Campus Safety & Well-being - Anti-ragging and grievance redressal mechanisms- Counseling and mental health support- Gender sensitization initiatives
10. Co-curricular & Extra-curricular - Clubs, events, NSS/NCC, cultural and sports activities- Opportunities for leadership and public speaking
11. Innovation & Entrepreneurship - Incubation centers, hackathons, startup support- Exposure to patents, research projects
12. Global Exposure - MoUs with international universities- Student exchange programs, foreign language learning

📊 Sample Rating Scale for Students (1 to 5 Likert Scale)

Parameter Rating (Example)
Academic Quality 4.5
Curriculum Relevance 4.2
Learning Resources 4.0
Career Support 3.8
Campus Safety 4.6
Overall Satisfaction 4.3

🧠 Student-Centric Evaluation Methodology

  1. Quantitative Surveys – Use Google Forms with rating scales.

  2. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) – Deep dive into issues via student council or clubs.

  3. Exit Surveys – Final-year students reflect on their experience.

  4. Suggestion Boxes / Digital Feedback Tools – Ongoing anonymous input.

  5. Dashboard Analysis – Track trends semester by semester.


🎯 What Makes a University Truly Student-Centric?

  • Learner-first policy in curriculum and support services

  • Holistic growth: intellectual, emotional, professional

  • Feedback responsiveness: student voices shape decisions

  • Future-ready approach: ensures employability, innovation, and values


Would you like a Google Form or dashboard template specifically designed to evaluate these student parameters?

University Performance

 Judging a university from the perspective of its stakeholders—students, staff, parents, and industry—requires a balanced, evidence-based evaluation based on the specific expectations, experiences, and outcomes relevant to each group.

Below is a comprehensive framework that summarizes how each stakeholder evaluates the university, followed by key criteria and a scoring/rating approach.


🎯 Stakeholder-Based University Evaluation Framework

Stakeholder Core Expectations Key Evaluation Criteria Indicators
Students Quality education, career readiness, support Teaching, curriculum, resources, placements, well-being Course quality, faculty interaction, internships, digital access, safety
Staff Work culture, recognition, growth opportunities Resources, HR policies, leadership, development Training access, decision inclusion, facilities, satisfaction
Parents Student growth, safety, transparency Academic value, campus security, communication Feedback channels, student monitoring, responsiveness
Industry Employable graduates, collaboration Curriculum relevance, skillset, engagement Job-readiness, collaboration frequency, R&D interaction

🔍 Evaluation Criteria by Stakeholder

🧑‍🎓 1. Students

  • Teaching Quality: Faculty expertise, interactive pedagogy

  • Curriculum Relevance: Alignment with industry needs

  • Resources: Labs, digital tools, library

  • Placement/Internships: Access, quality, support

  • Campus Life & Support: Counseling, safety, inclusivity

👩‍🏫 2. Staff

  • Professional Development: Workshops, conferences

  • Work Culture: Transparency, fairness, communication

  • Support Systems: Admin support, workload balance

  • Recognition: Career progression, rewards

👨‍👩‍👧 3. Parents

  • Academic Rigor: Curriculum quality, academic results

  • Student Welfare: Hostel, security, grievance redressal

  • Engagement: Open houses, newsletters, portals

  • Value for Money: ROI in terms of growth and jobs

🏭 4. Industry

  • Graduate Readiness: Skills, attitude, communication

  • Collaboration: Advisory boards, joint projects, internships

  • Curriculum Input: Ability to influence programs

  • University Responsiveness: MOU handling, innovation hubs


📊 Sample Scoring Method (Out of 5 for Each Domain)

Domain Students Staff Parents Industry
Curriculum Relevance 4.2 4.0 4.1 3.5
Teaching Quality 4.5 4.2 4.0 3.8
Industry Readiness 3.9 3.7 3.8 4.1
Communication 4.0 3.9 4.2 3.6
Support Systems 4.3 4.0 4.5 -
Engagement 4.1 3.8 4.3 3.7

Overall Composite Rating: 4.0 / 5


✅ How to Use This Evaluation

  1. Collect stakeholder feedback using structured Google Forms (like the one we've prepared).

  2. Analyze responses: Score each question by stakeholder group.

  3. Visualize findings using radar charts or heatmaps.

  4. Benchmark improvement over time via periodic surveys (every 6 or 12 months).

  5. Close the loop by using findings to inform:

    • Academic Council reviews

    • Quality Assurance Cell reports

    • NAAC/NBA/SAR submissions


Would you like help building a dashboard or report to consolidate responses automatically (using Google Sheets or Excel)?

Schema for SIRF

 Here is the complete SQL schema and sample data inserts for your educational ecosystem involving Universities, Colleges, Departments, Pro...