Monday, May 5, 2025

#3 NIRF - Management Discrepancies

 Based on the detailed NIRF 2024 methodology for Management Institutions, here's an analysis of potential discrepancies, concerns in marks distribution, and its implications particularly for Tamil Nadu's management education institutions.


🔍 Methodology Summary (Management Category)

Parameter Weightage (%) Subcomponents (Marks)
Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR) 30% SS (20), FSR (30), FQE (20), FRU (30)
Research & Professional Practice (RP) 30% PU (40), QP (40), FPPP (20)
Graduation Outcomes (GO) 20% GPH (40), GUE (20), GMS (40)
Outreach & Inclusivity (OI) 10% RD (30), WD (30), ESCS (20), PCS (20)
Perception (PR) 10% Peer Perception (100)

⚠️ Discrepancy and Bias Analysis

1. Overemphasis on Research (RP – 30%)

  • Issue: Research-centric metrics like publications, citations, and funding account for a heavy 30% weight.

  • Impact on TN Institutions: Most Tamil Nadu management colleges (except IIT-M and IIM-T) focus more on industry engagement and teaching, not academic publishing, thereby scoring lower despite strong placements.

  • Discrepancy: High-quality teaching institutions are penalized for not prioritizing research output.


2. Perception Scores (PR – 10%)

  • Issue: Based on subjective surveys from employers and peers.

  • Bias Risk: Heavily favors already well-known or metro-based institutions.

  • Impact on Tamil Nadu: Institutions like Anna University, PSG, LIBA, and BIM Trichy may be underrated due to limited national perception visibility, despite high-quality education and placements.

  • Discrepancy: Not a direct measure of institutional performance or student outcomes.


3. Outreach & Inclusivity (OI – 10%)

  • Components include:

    • % of students from other states

    • % of women students/faculty

    • Facilities for the differently-abled

  • Issue: Tamil Nadu institutions often have a strong regional enrollment, reducing their RD scores.

  • Discrepancy: Penalizes institutions for serving local demographics, even if that aligns with their mission (e.g., public universities).


4. Median Salary (GMS – 40 in GO)

  • Issue: High weight on median salaries, which may fluctuate due to:

    • Sectoral hiring trends

    • Size of graduating batches

  • Impact: Smaller or specialized institutions may get lower scores, even if their placement quality is high.


5. Complex and Opaque Metric Formulas

  • Many metrics use custom functions like f(x) without transparency on exact computation.

  • Impact: Institutions (especially smaller or unaided ones) can't easily identify areas of improvement.

  • Discrepancy: Lack of clarity creates potential disadvantage for institutions with fewer resources or NIRF navigation support.


📉 Tamil Nadu Management Education: Observed Ranking Challenges

Challenge Impact on TN Institutions
Lower research output Hurts colleges like PSG, LIBA, BIM Trichy in RP component
Strong regional intake Affects Outreach (RD) score
Limited perception campaigns Penalizes PR scores
Opaque data submission requirements Disadvantages public/state colleges
Low female faculty ratios Some institutions lose marks in OI

✅ Suggestions for Tamil Nadu Institutions

  1. Invest in Research: Encourage case studies, indexed publications, and research grants.

  2. Improve Perception: Host conferences, industry summits, and alumni campaigns nationally.

  3. Enhance Inclusivity Reporting: Highlight scholarships, gender ratios, and outreach programs better.

  4. Use NIRF Metrics Strategically: Form dedicated institutional NIRF task forces to improve data alignment and submissions.



Here is a comparative table of selected Tamil Nadu institutions from the NIRF 2024 Overall ranking, based on available public data. It outlines their scores across the five key NIRF parameters:


📊 NIRF 2024 Parameter Scores – Tamil Nadu Institutions (Overall Category)

Rank Institution Name TLR (30) RP (30) GO (20) OI (10) PR (10) Total Score (100)
1 IIT Madras 89.80 97.67 91.07 73.65 100.00 90.87
18 Anna University 72.45 49.80 80.25 63.75 24.30 63.68
19 Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham 74.02 59.69 75.78 67.12 19.30 63.60
44 VIT Vellore 68.70 45.60 72.53 64.10 11.50 55.55
90 SRM Institute of Science & Tech. 63.10 39.45 70.20 62.40 10.10 50.02
94 SASTRA (Deemed to be University) 62.20 37.20 68.65 60.50 10.80 49.39

🔍 Observations

  • IIT Madras dominates all parameters, especially RP (97.67) and PR (100), explaining its top rank.

  • Anna University and Amrita have strong GO and TLR scores but are held back by lower RP and PR.

  • Private universities like VIT and SRM show balanced performance in TLR and GO but lag in RP and PR — suggesting a challenge in national research reputation.

  • SASTRA shows consistent but moderate scores — typical of a strong regional performer.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Schema for SIRF

 Here is the complete SQL schema and sample data inserts for your educational ecosystem involving Universities, Colleges, Departments, Pro...