#9 Additional Parameters Suggested

Here’s an integrated framework including the new Future-Ready Technology Integration (FRTI) category, with a revised weight distribution for balanced evaluation.

---

Revised University Ranking Framework with Future Technologies

Category	Sub-Parameter	Code	Max Score	Notes
1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR)	Faculty Quality, Pedagogy, Labs	1	70	Includes OBE & digital learning
	Sports & Extra-curricular Activities	1(d)	10
Subtotal TLR			80
2. Research, Innovation & Intellectual Capital (RIIC)	Research Quality & Output	2(a)	30	Publications, citations
	Innovation Outputs (Patents, Startups)	2(b)	30	IPR, start-up reports
	Interdisciplinary & Industry Collaboration	2(c)	20	MoUs, projects
	Open Knowledge Contribution (MOOCs, OERs)	2(d)	20	Digital content contributions
Subtotal RIIC			100
3. Student Outcome & Employability (SOE)	Exam Results & Pass Quality	3(a)	25	Exam board reports
	Placement & Internship	3(b)	30	T&P cell data
	OBE-based Course Outcome Mapping	3(c)	30	Attainment reports
	Competitive Exams & Higher Studies	3(d)	15	Proof from students
Subtotal SOE			100
4. Inclusivity, Accessibility & Outreach (IAO)	Diversity Index	4(a)	25	Admission data
	Facilities for Disadvantaged Groups	4(b)	25	Audit reports
	Outreach, MOOCs & Lifelong Learning	4(c)	25	Extension records
	Alumni & Community Engagement	4(d)	25	Alumni office data
Subtotal IAO			100
5. Perception & Trust Index (PTI)	Peer & Employer Perception	5(a)	30	Survey results
	Student Feedback	5(b)	30	Digital feedback
	Application-Seat Ratio & Retention	5(c)	20	Admission data
	Transparency & Data Integrity	5(d)	20	Third-party verification
Subtotal PTI			100
6. Future-Ready Technology Integration (FRTI)	AI Research & Applications	6(a)	20	Publications, projects
	Quantum Computing Research	6(b)	15	Research, collaborations
	EV & Renewable Energy Initiatives	6(c)	15	Labs, patents, startups
	Smart Campus & LMS Adoption	6(d)	20	Digital tools, AI-LMS usage
	Interdisciplinary Innovation Hubs	6(e)	30	Centres combining tech domains
Subtotal FRTI			100

---

Revised Weight Distribution (Total 600 Marks)

Category	Weight (Marks)	Weight (%)
Teaching, Learning & Resources	80	13.3%
Research, Innovation & Intellectual Capital	100	16.7%
Student Outcome & Employability	100	16.7%
Inclusivity, Accessibility & Outreach	100	16.7%
Perception & Trust Index	100	16.7%
Future-Ready Technology Integration	100	16.7%
Total	600	100%

---

Audit Template Notes:

• Each parameter should have clear evidence sources (reports, digital data, surveys).

• FRTI parameters require documentation on technology projects, research outputs, labs, and LMS analytics.

• Weight reduction was done mostly in TLR to accommodate FRTI while keeping the balance.

• This framework ensures innovation & technology readiness without compromising core academic quality and inclusivity.

---

Modifications/Corrections:

Certainly! To keep Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR) at 100 marks while maintaining the total at 600, I'll slightly adjust weights in other categories proportionally.

---

Revised Weight Distribution with TLR = 100 Marks

Category	Weight (Marks)	Weight (%)
1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR)	100	16.7%
2. Research, Innovation & Intellectual Capital (RIIC)	90	15.0%
3. Student Outcome & Employability (SOE)	90	15.0%
4. Inclusivity, Accessibility & Outreach (IAO)	90	15.0%
5. Perception & Trust Index (PTI)	90	15.0%
6. Future-Ready Technology Integration (FRTI)	140	23.3%
Total	600	100%

---

Adjusted Sub-parameters for TLR (Total 100 Marks)

Sub-Parameter	Code	Max Score
Faculty Quality & Pedagogy (including OBE & digital learning)	1(a)	60
Library, Laboratory & Digital Resources	1(b)	30
Sports & Extra-curricular Activities	1(c)	10
Total TLR		100

---

Explanation:

• TLR is restored to 100 marks with focus on faculty, pedagogy, and infrastructure.

• RIIC, SOE, IAO, and PTI slightly reduced but still robust at 90 each.

• FRTI given a higher weight (140) to emphasize future technologies.

• Total remains 600 marks, keeping a balanced and comprehensive evaluation.

---